A view of Supreme Court of India. File

A view of Supreme Court of India. File | Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (November 3, 2026) held that the decree of divorce granted by a foreign court on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not legal.

A bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar made the observation while dismissing a plea by a man seeking quashing of a case lodged against him for bigamy and criminal conspiracy.

"In our view, the foreign divorce decree was passed in contravention of the existing matrimonial law in India and on a ground that is not even recognised statutorily.”

"This not only violates the legal threshold of Section 13 of the CPC, which every foreign decree has to pass through, but also the observations made by this Court as to the conditions required to be fulfilled by a foreign decree to be enforceable in India," the bench said.

Dealing with the case, the top court said the sanctity of matrimonial status cannot be allowed to yield to such 'forum non conveniens' (inconvenient forum).

"We cannot accept this submission in the manner canvassed as accused No.1/husband was married to respondent No.2/first wife in India under the Hindu rites, rituals and customs

"Thus, even if the second marriage took place outside India, the allegations under Section 494 of the IPC cannot be said to be diluted since enquiry for the offence of bigamy cannot be confined to the place of second marriage but must necessarily take into account the subsisting matrimonial relationship," the bench said.

In this case, the man married his first wife on April 18, 2003, in Sattenapalli, Andhra Pradesh, according to Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage, they resided in Hyderabad, where the husband was pursing post graduation from Osmania Medical College.

On February 4, 2005, the man went to the U.K. to pursue his career as a doctor and was later joined by his wife.

In August 2007, the first wife returned to her parental home in Sattenapalli for delivery. The man claimed that despite repeated requests, she did not return to the U.K.

As the matrimonial relationship of the parties deteriorated, the husband instituted divorce and custody proceedings before the competent court at Narasaraopet, Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, which were dismissed.

Later, he filed an appeal in the high court but it was subsequently withdrawn.

The husband was granted UK citizenship on February 1, 2013, and he instituted

divorce proceedings against the first wife before the Cambridge County Court in England, which granted him divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage in 2014.

The man later remarried in Norfolk, UK.

Almost after two years, the first wife lodged a complaint at the Sattenapalli town police station, Guntur, under sections 494, 120B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

While refusing to set aside the case against the man, the top court quashed criminal proceedings against his parents and second wife.

Published - November 03, 2026 08:19 pm IST

Source: The Hindu · PTI

At a glance

Topic
World
Country
🇮🇳 IN
Publisher language
EN
Added to Allnira